Home Blog Page 127

Will South Sudan’s new peace agreement hold?

0

Tens of thousands of South Sudanese cheered, paraded and danced around the grounds of the John Garang Memorial Park in the capital city of Juba last week, celebrating a fresh peace deal. Rebel leader, Riek Machar, who once served as the country’s vice president, had flown back from exile and took the stage last Thursday along with South Sudan’s president, Salva Kiir. The arch rivalry between these two men has fueled the civil war in South Sudan.

Read the full story from NPR here.

Opinion: The importance of alternative media

0

Op-Ed: John Scales Avery is a theoretical chemist and peace activist, born in Lebanon to U.S. parents. He was part of a group associated with the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, which received the 1995 Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts to seek solutions to conflict and global security threats.

Mass media could potentially be a great force for public education, but in general their role is not only unhelpful, it is often negative. War and conflict are blatantly advertised by television and newspapers. A consumer who subscribes to the “package” of broadcasts sold by a cable company can often search through all 100 or so channels without finding a single program that offers insight into the various problems that are facing the world today. What the viewer finds instead is a mixture of sitcoms, “reality” programs, gardening shows and food channels. Meanwhile the neglected global problems are becoming progressively more severe.

In general, mass media personnel behave as though their role is to prevent the peoples of the world from working together to change the world, and to save it from thermonuclear and environmental catastrophes. The television viewer sits slumped in a chair, passive, isolated, dis-empowered and stupefied. The future of the world hangs in the balance, but the television viewer feels no impulse to work actively to change the world, or to save it. The Roman emperors gave their people bread and circuses to numb them into political inactivity. Modern mass media seem to be playing a similar role.

In 1955, following the explosion of an enormously powerful thermonuclear bomb, Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell became concerned and wrote a declaration that proved to be the founding document of the Pugwash Conferences. The document reads: “Here then is the problem that we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?… There lies before us, if we choose, continual progress in happiness, knowledge and wisdom. Shall we, instead, choose death because we cannot forget our quarrels? We appeal as human beings to human beings: Remember your humanity, and forget the rest.”

These words accurately describe our present situation, but mass media gives us no information about the constant existential danger that a thermonuclear war, produced by human folly or technical failure, could destroy our civilization and much of the biosphere.

We live at a critical moment of history and our duty to future generations is clear. We must eliminate the institution of war; and we must develop new ethics to match our advanced technology, ethics in which narrow selfishness, short-sightedness and nationalism are replaced by loyalty to humanity as a whole, combined with respect for nature. Mass media could mobilize us to action, but they have failed in their duty. Our educational systems could also wake us up, but they too have failed us. The battle to save the earth from human greed and folly has to be fought in alternative media.

Alternative media, and all who work with it, deserve both our gratitude and our financial support. They alone, can correct the distorted and incomplete picture of the world that we obtain from mass media. They alone can show us the path to a future in which our children, grandchildren, and all future generations can survive.

John Avery’s book, discussing the importance of alternative media, can be downloaded for free here.

Opinion: Why Should I Seek Common Ground With My Fellow Americans?

0

Op-Ed: Shamil Idriss is the Chief Executive Officer of Search for Common Ground, the world’s largest dedicated peacebuilding organization. This opinion essay was originally published by SFCG here.

As we emerge from the most hotly contested mid-term elections in recent memory, still mired in the most polarized era of our history since the days of Vietnam and Watergate, Americans need to ask ourselves: is there any virtue in seeking common ground with fellow citizens whose views we find indefensible?

As head of Search for Common Ground, the world’s largest peacebuilding organization, with decades of experiences in countries that have emerged from polarization and violence stronger and healthier than ever before, and still others that have descended into destructive conflict, the answer to me is a clear and definitive “yes”.

But for Americans today, this is no rhetorical question.

Pew Research Center polling shows that nearly half of registered Democrats and Republicans view the other party as “a threat to the nation’s well-being”. And our daily news is full of vitriolic public discourse and reports of acts of violence fueled by hate and fear of our fellow citizens.

In this light, it is understandable that many Americans are losing faith that we can come together across our political, racial and other dividing lines. Some are reaching the conclusion that there is little point in even trying. After all, the argument goes, when dealing with the hateful ideologies that give rise to such vile behavior, searching for common ground is a betrayal. It means accommodating hate in order to avoid conflict when we should instead take a strong stance in defense of human dignity and for justice.

But in this denigration of the pursuit of common ground, there is a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means to search for common ground. Or at least what those of us working for an organization that has taken this as our name and mission mean by that term.

With nearly 700 staff working on the frontlines of some of the world’s most devastating conflicts — from Syria and Yemen to Myanmar and South Sudan — the local peacebuilding teams I have the privilege to represent put their reputations and, in some cases, their very lives on the line to pursue “common ground”. Their efforts over the past 35+ years gained them recognition for helping to prevent genocide in Burundi, public acknowledgment from a previous U.S. Secretary of State and Iranian Foreign Minister for providing breakthrough ideas critical to the consummation of the Iran nuclear deal, and a nomination for the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize.

Their work demonstrates that there is no dichotomy between searching for common ground and standing for justice. Indeed, searching for common ground is among the most honorable, pragmatic, and effective ways to build healthy, safe, and just societies. And it may be the best way for Americans to pave a path out of our current era of extreme polarization toward the more perfect union we have been pursuing since our founding.

There is virtue in pursuing common ground because no individual is reducible to his or her most abhorrent position or action. And not everyone who falls in line with hate is irredeemably lost — indeed, most are not.

There is virtue in pursuing common ground because when you study what actually transforms people — what turns militants into peacebuilders, provocateurs into bridge-builders, and yes, even racists into champions of diversity — you see that it is almost never the experience of being shouted down or shut out, but rather human connections with the very people that they had learned to hate.

There is virtue in pursuing common ground because common ground is not middle ground. It is often new ground. It is not just static, lying below the surface waiting to be discovered. It is also dynamic, waiting to be created. For as we do the hard work of scratching below the surface to understand an opponent’s hopes, fears, and values — not just their most visible stances — and to cooperate together in those areas where we can agree, we not only build trust between us. We also ignite an unpredictable, creative, and sometimes transformational process that can give rise to new, previously unimaginable opportunities. And it is that process, patiently and tirelessly pursued, that paves the path to real redemption for even the most divided communities.

And finally, there is virtue in pursuing common ground because there is integrity and power in aligning our ends and our means. Consider Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, or Martin Luther King, Jr. In hindsight, no one would accuse these greats of insufficiently standing up for what is right, of being too accommodating of hate. But at the time that they each risked their lives to reach across the dividing lines in their countries? Even while they were being painted as dangerous militants and wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing by those who wanted to maintain the unjust power structures of the time, they were also vilified by many who should have been their natural allies as sell-outs, naïve dreamers, and weak-kneed pacifists.

What we call searching for common ground is not about coming together across any dividing line — neo-Nazis and immigrants, anarchists and police — to meet in the middle and compromise our principles in an effort to avoid real conflict in favor of “keeping the peace”.

It is rather about digging beyond the simplistic headlines, tweets, and memes to connect with the basic humanity that we know exists across all lines of diversity. To uncover there the fears, hopes, and interests on which we can agree, and to use them as a basis to build trust and cooperate in ways that advance our shared interests and protect the dignity of all concerned. It is about igniting a cycle of joint problem-solving and relationship-building that is the best way to yield solutions otherwise unimaginable or unattainable to us when we remain closeted in our own segregated camps.

In short, pursuing common ground is not a betrayal of justice. It is among the most courageous ways to manifest justice in your activism, not just in your goals.

It is also among the most critical tasks for American citizens to take up if we are to emerge from this current era of polarization stronger than ever, still embodying our founding motto: e pluribus unum.

See more Peace News stories on Reconciling America and Reaching the “Enemy”.

James Mattis: Yemen Needs a Truce Within 30 Days

0

Secretary of Defense James Mattis this week called upon combatants in Yemen, including Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi faction, to negotiate a cease-fire in that war within 30 days while speaking to diplomats, military officers and conflict-resolution specialists at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Get the full story here.

South Sudan rebel leader returns for peace deal

0

South Sudan rebel leader Riek Machar returned to the capital Juba on Wednesday to celebrate a peace deal, more than two years after fierce fighting erupted in the city and forced him to flee the country. To further reinforce the peace deal, President Salva Kiir ordered the release of a jailed advisor to Machar, and a spokesman to his rebel group.

Get the full story from Reuters here.